Skip to main content

UK will never leave EU


Britain’s departure from the European Union (EU) is impossible considering the complex process it requires, warns a top British professor, blasting Brexiteers for not realizing the “sheer enormity” of their decision.
Nearly 52 percent of British voters opted to leave the EU in a referendum on June 23, in hopes of taking back control over their borders and having more economic freedom.
Professor Thom Brooks, who is head of Law at the University of Durham, doubted that the UK government would ever be able to end the over 4-decades-old membership in the union, The Independent reported Tuesday.
“There is a 42 year evolving legal relationship that is not so easy to unpick. It is an absolutely massive task,” he told the British daily.
In order to leave the EU, Britain needs to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty to trigger the process.
Brooks, however, said the article was unlikely to ever be invoked, and if it was it could “let down the next generation.”
“The closer the government looks at what is actually involved in leaving then the less likely they are going to be jumping ship,” said Brooks, who advised the Electoral Commission on the wording of the referendum question.
The Telegraph reported on Friday that British Prime Minister Theresa May will invoke Article 50 without a vote in the UK Parliament.
Such a decision is likely to outrage Brexit opponents, who say the referendum’s advisory nature means the House of Commons needs to put the matter to vote before the formal process is triggered.
The majority of lawmakers in the lower house of Parliament, a total of around 480, campaigned for the UK to stay in the EU before the Brexit vote.
Brooks, whose research has been quoted in the House of Lords, dismissed May’s plans for Brexit as “Gobbledygook,” and predicted that Brexit ministers would take a U-turn on their commitment to leave the EU and demand a second vote.
A group of lawyers has initiated a legal challenge in an attempt to force May to hold a parliamentary vote.
The case, which will be heard in the High Court in October, argues that Article 50 cannot be invoked until the European Communities Act of 1972 is revoked.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Saudis put restrictions on Yemeni pilgrims

Saudi Arabia has put more restrictions on Yemenis who wish to perform their Hajj pilgrimage. Officials say the kingdom has refused to allow the Ministry of Religious Endowments and Guidance to complete the official procedures for Yemeni pilgrims wishing to perform Hajj rituals this year.

Trump accuses Obama, Hillary Clinton of founding Daesh

US President Barack Obama and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton “founded” the Daesh (ISIL) terrorist group in the Middle East region, according to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Addressing supporters at a rally in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, on Wednesday, Trump said Daesh is "honoring President Obama." “He’s the founder of ISIS. He's the founder! He founded ISIS,” the real estate tycoon said, using an alternative acronym for the terrorist group. “I would say the co-founder would be ‘Crooked’ Hillary Clinton,” Trump added. He went on to criticize Obama’s decision to withdraw American military forces from Iraq and leaving behind a void for Daesh terrorists to fill. “We should never have gotten out the way we got out,” he said. “We unleashed terrible fury all over the Middle East." “Instead of allowing some small forces behind to maybe, just maybe, keep it under control, we pulled it out,” he continued. Daesh terrorists, m

Syria war keeps Israel safe from attacks

Press TV has interviewed Naseer al-Omari, a writer and political commentator from New York, to further discuss Israel’s recent airstrikes on Syrian army positions in the Golan Heights. Press TV:  This is not the first time that we’ve seen Israel hitting targets within Syria, specifically along the Golan Heights. When Israel does that, who does it benefit? Al-Omari:  I think it benefits itself and it sends a message to all factions fighting in Syria that it holds the Syrian government responsible for any attacks on its borders as they have made it clear. In other words, it doesn’t matter who is firing at Israel, they will always hold the regime responsible for it and respond to the Syrian army. I believe that Israel is very comfortable nowadays with everybody busy fighting each other in Syria. They have had safe and secure borders for many years now and it’s actually Syria that has become the Wild West right now with all these factions fighting and civilians paying a heavy pric